ACOLITE processing - missing pixels

Discussion of your results and ACOLITE in general
Post Reply
dnwright
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2018 4:20 pm

ACOLITE processing - missing pixels

Post by dnwright »

Hi Quinten,

I am finding that after processing S2 L1C images with ACOLITE the results have many NaN values (compared with Sen2Cor processing) even though the images have extremely low cloud cover (<0.01%). Is this to do with some kind of threshold that is set in the advanced setting? I have attached a screenshot of a river I have processed using the 'SPM_NECHAD_865' algorithm, please let me know if any other information may come in useful.

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Kind regards,
Duncan
Attachments
SPM_NECHAD_865 processing result
SPM_NECHAD_865 processing result
Screen Shot 2018-02-24 at 15.55.06.jpg (75.65 KiB) Viewed 7818 times
quinten
Posts: 1019
Joined: Tue Mar 03, 2015 8:13 am

Re: ACOLITE processing - missing pixels

Post by quinten »

Hi Duncan

This is probably related to the noise in the SWIR bands, and could be reduced by using a fixed aerosol reflectance over your subscene, or by applying a smoothing filter on those bands. (See e.g. http://odnature.naturalsciences.be/rems ... ?f=11&t=37)

Quinten
Post Reply